WASHINGTON (CNN) — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told CNBC Wednesday the Obama administration is “absolutely” prepared to go off the fiscal cliff unless Republicans drop their opposition to higher income tax rates on the wealthy.
Geithner said both sides were making progress toward a deal that would avoid the package of deep spending cuts and across-the-board tax hikes that are scheduled to take effect Jan. 1.
Both sides agree the wealthy will pay more, so now fiscal cliff talks come down to how much Republicans can wring out of the White House in return for giving in on taxes.
To President Barack Obama, it’s all about first locking in additional revenue from raising taxes on high-income owners, an outcome the GOP has long rejected.
Republicans led by House Speaker John Boehner want to secure commitments on entitlement reforms and spending cuts opposed by Democrats as part of a broader agreement to reduce the nation’s chronic federal deficits and debt.
Retiring Republican Rep. Steve LaTourette of Ohio told CNN on Thursday that he sensed a shift in the House GOP approach during a conference meeting the day before.
“The sense was that there’s a growing number of folks in our party that are saying, you know what, the president has won this round relative to the rates, but we need to you to sit down and get the second half of the deal and that’s the spending,” LaTourette said.
It remains unclear if a deal will happen before the end of the year — less than four weeks away — or if the negotiations will carry over into 2013 after the fiscal cliff of automatic tax hikes and spending cuts takes effect.
While economists warn that going over the fiscal cliff could lead to a recession, the administration has signaled it can delay some of the impacts for month to allow time to work out a deal.
All signs point toward a two-step approach sought by newly re-elected Obama — an initial agreement that would extend lower tax rates for income up to $250,000 for families, while letting rates return to higher levels from the Clinton era on income above that threshold.
Even conservatives such as Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal acknowledge the obvious — taxes on the wealthy are going up despite opposition by Republicans.
“Whatever deal is reached is going to contain elements that are detrimental to our economy,” Jindal wrote Thursday in an opinion piece published by Politico. “Elections have consequences, and the country is going to feel those consequences soon.”
At the same time, Jindal wrote, “Republicans certainly should fight to at least get something done that will matter.”
“At present, any reading of the headlines over the past week indicates that Republicans are fighting to protect the rich and cut benefits for seniors,” he added. “It may be possible to have worse political positioning than that, but I’m not sure how.”
Coburn, a notorious fiscal hawk, told MSNBC on Wednesday that he would support higher tax rates on wealthier Americans as part of a broader deal to avoid the fiscal cliff and broader deficit crisis.
“I know we have to raise revenue,” Coburn said. “I don’t really care which way we do it. Actually, I would rather see rates go up than do it the other way, because it gives us a greater chance to reform the tax code and broaden the base in the future.”
After meeting with his conference Wednesday, Boehner told reporters that the rich will be paying more, but he still hoped to limit any increase to ending tax deductions and loopholes rather than Obama’s demand for higher rates.
“We have got to cut spending and I believe it is appropriate to put revenues on the table,” Boehner said. “Now, the revenues that we are putting on the table are going to come from guess who? The rich.”
He continued, “There are ways to limit deductions, close loopholes and have the same people pay more of their money to the federal government without raising tax rates, which we believe will harm our economy.”
Obama, however, continued to insist that Republicans have to ensure no one except the highest-earning 2% of Americans will face higher taxes before working out a broader agreement on tackling the nation’s chronic federal deficits and debt.
In remarks to business leaders on Wednesday, Obama said Boehner and Republicans have to take the first step.
“I think there is recognition that maybe they can accept some rate increases as long as it is combined with serious entitlement reform and additional spending cuts,” the president said. “And if we can get the leadership on the Republican side to take that framework, to acknowledge that reality, then the numbers actually aren’t that far apart.”
He added that “we can probably solve this in about a week — it’s not that tough.”
The statements reflected how negotiations on the the fiscal cliff have evolved since last month’s election, when Obama won a second term and Democrats made gains in both chambers of Congress.
Republicans opposed to any new revenue in their quest to shrink government now realize Obama’s victory and public support for the president’s campaign theme of higher taxes on the wealthy leave them with little negotiating leverage.
A new poll Thursday was the third in recent days to indicate most Americans accepted raising taxes on incomes over $250,000 as part of a fiscal cliff deal.
The Quinnipiac University national survey showed 65% of registered voters support higher taxes on the wealthy, though Republican respondents were opposed,53% to 41%.
Also, a Washington Post/Pew Research Center survey released Tuesday showed 53% of respondents would blame Republicans for failure to reach a deal, compared with 27% who would blame Obama. A CNN/ORC International poll released last week showed 45% would blame congressional Republicans compared with 34% who would hold Obama responsible.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told CNBC Wednesday the Obama administration is “absolutely” prepared to go off the fiscal cliff “if there’s no prospect to an agreement that doesn’t involve those rates on the top 2%.”
Despite the public stance softening of some Republicans in each house, signs point to a continuing standoff for now.
Obama and Boehner spoke on the phone Wednesday afternoon for the first time in a week, according to a source familiar with the call. However, the source said the conversation didn’t lead to any breakthrough. No formal negotiating sessions are known to be scheduled.
The House is scheduled to adjourn for the year on December 14, but Boehner’s number two, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, said Wednesday the chamber would remain in session until a fiscal cliff deal gets reached.
Boehner, meanwhile, challenged Obama to talk, saying, “I’ll be here and I’ll be available at any moment to sit down with the president to get serious about solving this problem.”
Obama demands that the House immediately pass a measure already approved by the Senate to extend tax cuts from 2001 and 2003 on income up to $250,000 for families.
He contends that both Democrats and Republicans agree that the 98% of American families making less than $250,000 a year should avoid a tax hike when the lower rates from the Bush administration expire on December 31. They call for the House to guarantee that outcome by passing the Senate measure now.
Once that happens, Obama and Democratic leaders promise, they will work out compromises on other spending cuts sought by Republicans to reduce the deficit, such as reforms to the Medicare and Medicaid entitlement programs.
The latest proposal from House Republicans could reduce federal deficits by $2.2 trillion over 10 years, GOP leaders say.
The GOP proposal includes $800 billion from tax reform, $600 billion from Medicare reforms and other health savings and $600 billion in other spending cuts, House Republican leadership aides said. It also pledges $200 billion in savings by revising the consumer price index, a measure of inflation.
While the Republicans gave ground by calling for more revenue through tax reform, the plan mentioned only unspecified elimination of some deductions and loopholes.
Obama’s broader deficit reduction plan calls for deficit reduction of about $500 billion over 10 years by limiting itemized tax deductions and other benefits for high-income earners. The 28% limit on deductions would apply to families earning more than $250,000 and individuals making more than $200,000, according to the White House.
Jason Furman, an assistant to Obama on economic policy, told reporters Wednesday that the president wants to ensure additional revenue from higher taxes on the wealthy now to help avoid the fiscal cliff.
“What we’re seeking to do is to lock in revenue this year, not have some vague process that may or may not add up to something, you know, in the future, and so we’re trying to pass something this month,” Furman said.
He described the Republican proposal for more revenue as lacking specifics.
“Tell us what it is. Show us a score,” Furman said. “Tell us how it locks in revenue because you’re trying to actually pass a bill this year, not engage in some long process around tax reform, which we don’t have time to do by the end of this year.”
The White House has made clear Obama will veto any measure that fails to increase tax rates on the wealthy, but aides have signaled a possible willingness to negotiate the specific rate increase.
In an interview with Bloomberg TV this week, Obama said lower tax rates for the wealthy could be negotiated as part of broader tax reform in 2013, but only after those rates increase now.
Obama’s deficit-reduction plan would increase taxes by almost $1 trillion over 10 years, a significant portion of a $4 trillion overall deficit-reduction goal.
It also would close loopholes, limit deductions, raise the estate tax rate to 2009 levels and increases tax rates on capital gains and dividends.
The Obama plan includes $50 billion in stimulus spending for programs intended to create jobs, such as repairing roads and bridges.
Experts have said failing to reach a fiscal cliff deal and devise a framework for a broader deficit reduction package to be negotiated when the new Congress is seated in January would cause economic turmoil.
The non-partisan Tax Policy Center estimates that middle-class families would pay about $2,000 a year more in taxes without action.